Evaluation of Military Logistics Vehicles in Public Procurement


  • Nikolaj Dobržinskij General Jonas Žemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania, Šilo g. 5A, Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Jan Furch
  • Rasa Dobržinskienė Institute of General and Social Competences of Public Security Academy of Mykolas Romeris Uni-versity; V. Putvinskio g. 70, Kaunas




evaluation criteria, military logistics vehicles, public procurement


The current geopolitical situation in the Europe is forcing some countries to modernize the equipment and armaments of their armies and to prepare for response to potential threats. It is difficult to assess the advantageousness and quality of military logistics vehicles to be purchased when there are different perceptions of the functionality of the product among future users, and in particular when the quality assessment tools are not perfect and the available and statutory quality assessment tools are hardly used in tendering procedures. This article presents the methodology for the evaluation of military logistics vehicles in public procurement. The proposed methodology allows comparing military logistics vehicles on the basis of economic and technical criteria and assessing the needs of different users.

Author Biographies

  • Nikolaj Dobržinskij, General Jonas Žemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania, Šilo g. 5A, Vilnius, Lithuania

    ORCID> 0000-0003-3545-2501

  • Rasa Dobržinskienė, Institute of General and Social Competences of Public Security Academy of Mykolas Romeris Uni-versity; V. Putvinskio g. 70, Kaunas

    ORCID ID: 0000-0001-6590-4164


XI-1491. Law of the Republic of Lithuania on Public Procurement in the Field of Defense and Security (in Lithuanian) [online]. Vilnius: Valstybės Žinios, 2011. [viewed 2022-01-12]. Available from: https://www.e-tar.lt/portal/en/legalAct/TAR.E838D0C06065

GARVIN, D.A. Managing Quality: The Strategic and Competitive Edge. New York: Free Press, 1988. ISBN 978-0-02-911380-6.

ZHANG, B., Y. LE, B. XIA and M. SKITMORE. Causes of Business-To-Government Corruption in the Tendering Process in China. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2017, 33(2). DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000479.

BUURI, J.M. Factors Affecting Implementation of Open Tendering Process in Public Institutions. In: Proceedings of 1st JKUAT-SHRD Research Conference. Juja: JKUAT, 2016.

AL-HAMMADI, S. An Investigation into Current Tendering Process in Saudi Construction Projects. In: 5th International/11th Construction Specialty Conference. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Library, 2015. DOI 10.14288/1.0076378.

TARKKANEN, K. and V. HARKKE. Evaluation for Evaluation: Usability Work during Tendering Process. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2015. DOI 10.1145/2702613.2732851.

MALI, D., D. MOGAVEERA, P. KITAWAT and M. JAWWAD. Blockchain-Based E-tendering System. In: 4th International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS). Madurai: IEEE, 2020. DOI 10.1109/ICICCS48265.2020.9120890.

ACT No. 134/2016 Coll. on Public Procurement [online]. 2016. [viewed 2022-01-20]. Available from: https://www.uohs.cz/en/legislation/public-procurement.html

V-1111. Regarding the Approval of the Description of the Procedure for the Preparation, Coordination and Approval of Operational Requirements Documents (in Lithuanian). Vilnius: Valstysty Žinios, 2010.

FURCH, J. and V. KONEČNÝ. Product and its Life Cycle Cost Analysis. In: Proceedings of 25th International Scientific Conference. Transport Means 2021. Kaunas: Kaunas University of Technology, 2021, pp. 677-683. ISSN 1822-296X.

IEC 60300-3-3 Ed. 3.0 b:2017. Dependability Management - Part 3-3: Application Guide - Life Cycle Costing.

FURCH, J. and V. KONEČNÝ. Model Design of the Life Cycle Cost Analysis for the Acquisition of a Motor Vehicle. In: Proceedings of 25th International Scientific Conference. Transport Means 2021. Kaunas: Kaunas University of Technology, 2021, pp. 1181-1187. ISSN 1822-296X.

Wong, J.Y. Theory of Ground Vehicles. 4th ed. New York: Wiley, 2008. ISBN 978-0-470-17038-0.

MURO, T. and J. O´BRIEN. Terramechanics: Land Locomotion Mechanics. Cleveland: CRC Press, 2004. ISBN 0-367-39460-X.

WONG, Y.C.D., H.H.S. LIM and W.Q.W. CHAN. An Assessment of Land Vehicles’ Trafficability [online]. 2016 [viewed 2022-05-18]. Available from: https://www.dsta.gov.sg/docs/default-source/dsta-about/an-assessment-of-land-vehicles-trafficability.pdf?sfvrsn=2

ADNER, R. Match Your Innovation Strategy to Your Innovation Ecosystem [online]. 2006 [viewed 2022-05-05]. Available from: https://hbr.org/2006/04/match-your-innovation-strategy-to-your-innovation-ecosystem

JAVANSHIR, I., A. MASELENO, S. TASOUJIAN and M. OVEISI. Optimization of Suspension System of Heavy Off-Road Vehicle for Stability Enhancement Using Integrated Anti-Roll Bar and Coiling Spring Mechanism. Journal of Central South University, 2018, 25, pp. 2289-2298. DOI 10.1007/s11771-018-3913-6.

ČIOČYS, P.A. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Warfare (in Lithuanian). Vilnius: General Jonas Žemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania, 2020. ISBN 978-9955-423-66-9.

STANAG 4357, Allied Vehicle Testing Publication, 1991.

MENGERT P., S. SALVATORE, R. DISARIO and R. WALTER. Statistical Estimation of Rollover Risk [online]. 1989 [viewed 2022-04-09]. Available from: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/8620

STANAG 4569, Protection Levels for Occupants of Armoured Vehicles, 2022.

DOBRŽINSKIJ, N. Study of the Diesel Engines Operating in the Difficult Conditions [PhD Thesis]. Kaunas: Technological Sciences, 2013.

DENNING, R. Applied R&M Manual for Defence Systems [online]. 2012 [viewed 2022-05-07]. Available from: https://sars.org.uk/BOK/Applied%20R&M%20Manual%20for%20Defence%20Systems%20(GR-77)/p0c00.pdf

VELASQUEZ, M. and P.T. HESTER. An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods [online]. International Journal of Operations Research, 2013, 10(2), pp. 56-66. [viewed 2022-04-15]. Available from: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=264AD33AC8E50804E2A43E6533935911?doi=

SAATY, T.L. A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1977, 15(3), p. 234-281. DOI 10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5.

SAATY, T.L. How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 1990, 48(1), pp. 9-26. DOI 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I.

SAATY, T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy and Analytic Network Processes for the Measurement of Intangible Criteria and for Decision-Making. In: FIGUEIRA, J., S. GRECO and M. EHROGOTT. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. New York: Springer, 2005, pp. 345-405. ISBN 978-0-387-23067-2.

SAATY, T.L. and D. ERGU. When Is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 2015, 14(6), pp. 1171‑1187. DOI 10.1142/S021962201550025X.

JÁNSKÝ, J. and TUŠER, I. Security Management – Quantitative Determination of Crime Risk in a Selected Region: Case Study. In: TUŠER, I. and Š. HOŠKOVÁ-MAYEROVÁ, eds. Trends and Future Directions in Security and Emergency Management. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. New York: Springer, 2022, pp. 225-240. ISBN 978-3-030-88906-7.






Research Paper


How to Cite

Evaluation of Military Logistics Vehicles in Public Procurement. (2022). Advances in Military Technology, 17(2), 263-279. https://doi.org/10.3849/aimt.01737

Similar Articles

1-10 of 177

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.